image as text :: essays research papers

Image as text edition ResponseCritical ResponseArt by its very temperament has the tendency to be labeled either expert or pretty. However there is no terrible nontextual matter, only art that has failed to bind with a viewer. To broadly label art as either good or distressing is hypocritical, how could a Picasso be compared to a Rembrandt? The truth is it peckt, and thats the deceptiveness of art in that it seems on the surface to be so easily criticized when in reality its a obscure process to undertake. The piece I chose to write about evoked much(prenominal) a response. People around me either loathed it, or have it away it, with most going to the former. A good art piece creates this agreeable of response, and in that respect this piece was doing just fine.When I look at a piece of art, I let my eyes roam, exploring the surface. I tactile sensation whatever emotions the piece evokes, or any parts or techniques that concern me. After all of this, I still dont ma ke bold judge it merely on good or baffling. When you label something bad art, there is no coming back, its cursed with a tag. yet if this tag is incorrect, as it often is, you still ca-ca that impression in your head that oh, I dont like this piece, its bad. Another aspect to this is if you label a piece of art bad that means somewhere, floating around, is a piece of good art, which would imply a comparison. But how do you compare art? Even if two artists have both tackled the same topic, it is impossible and insulting to even claim to be able to compare them. A Renaissance piece and a churrigueresco piece have their own considerations and couldnt possibly be criticized. never is a piece of art better, all art is an island for consideration in its own sphere of influence. Art creates its own emotions, and the reaction it creates, love it or hate it, is the very point of art. If you fall madly in love with a piece, it has succeeded. On the other side of the same coin, if you de sperately hate that piece and want to burn it, it too has succeeded. It is when a piece of art has nothing to say that it is a failure, when it evokes no emotion, no reaction. It still isnt a bad piece of art, the artist just hasnt succeeded.